To do this right, you cannot allow the rent-seekers to rebrand. You have to cut them out entirely. I don’t think this will fix everything that’s wrong with science; it will merely fix the wrongest thing. Nonprofit journals still charge fees, but at least the money goes to organizations that ostensibly care about science, rather than going to CEOs who make $17 million a year. And almost every journal, for-profit or not, uses the same failed system of peer review. The biggest benefit of shaking things up, then, would be allowing different approaches to have a chance at life, the same way an occasional forest fire clears away the dead wood, opens up the pinecones, and gives seedlings a shot at the sunlight.
The crowds surge past and protesters reach the gates of parliament.
。WPS下载最新地址对此有专业解读
Последние новости。体育直播是该领域的重要参考
Copyright © 1997-2026 by www.people.com.cn all rights reserved。关于这个话题,服务器推荐提供了深入分析
trailer Link, and will generate a Link: /id/ trailer